5.0 KiB
5.0 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| nonprofit | Use this skill for nonprofit corporate governance drafting and review, especially when working on bylaws, board structure, member versus no-member governance, Illinois nonprofit law references, or 501(c)(3)-style organizational language using the local materials in this repository. |
Nonprofit Governance
Use this skill when the task is about nonprofit bylaws, governance structure, or adapting governance language from local reference documents.
When To Use
- Use this skill when drafting or revising nonprofit bylaws, articles-adjacent governance language, or internal governance policies.
- Use this skill when reviewing board powers, officer roles, meeting procedures, quorum, vacancies, removal, or amendment provisions for a nonprofit.
- Use this skill when the user wants language grounded in the Illinois not-for-profit framework or in the local sample bylaws stored in this repository.
- Use this skill when deciding whether the organization should be member-governed or board-governed with no statutory members.
Scope
This skill is a local drafting and review aid, not a substitute for legal advice.
- Prefer the local reference materials over memory when the user wants citation-backed drafting or comparison.
- Treat the Illinois statute excerpt as the controlling local legal reference among the files in this folder.
- Treat the sample bylaws as models to adapt, not boilerplate to copy blindly.
References
references/805-ILCS-105.md: excerpted Illinois General Not For Profit Corporation Act provisions focused on members, meetings, voting, proxies, quorum, records, and related governance mechanics.references/bylaws-of-revolution-working.md: example Illinois no-member 501(c)(3) bylaws with board-governed structure.references/non-profit-sample.md: broader sample nonprofit bylaws template with placeholders and optional affiliate/member-style provisions.
Load only the reference file(s) needed for the current task.
Workflow
- Identify the governance model the draft is trying to implement: no members, voting members, non-voting affiliates, or mixed structures.
- Read the minimum local reference material needed for that model.
- Separate mandatory governance mechanics from optional drafting choices.
- Draft or revise language so the document is internally consistent: membership clauses, board powers, officer provisions, meeting rules, quorum, voting, and amendment rules should not conflict.
- If borrowing from a sample, normalize terminology and cross-references so the final document reads as one instrument rather than pasted sections.
- Flag places where legal review is prudent, especially when the draft departs from the statute excerpt or mixes member and no-member concepts.
Drafting Rules
- Decide early whether the corporation has members. Do not mix "no members" language with member voting provisions unless the distinction is explicit and intentional.
- Keep the board article aligned with the membership model. If the corporation has no members, directors typically exercise powers otherwise assigned to members under the statute and bylaws.
- Preserve 501(c)(3)-style limits when the organization is meant to be tax-exempt: no private inurement, limits on political activity, and appropriate dissolution language.
- Use one consistent term for the governing body and its officers throughout the draft.
- Check meeting, notice, quorum, voting, proxy, and written-consent provisions as a set; these clauses commonly drift out of alignment.
- Treat sample officer and committee structures as optional. Tailor them to the organization instead of inheriting every office or committee by default.
- Remove placeholders, bracketed text, duplicated concepts, and state-law assumptions that do not match the target organization.
Illinois-Focused Review Points
When using the Illinois excerpt, pay particular attention to:
- whether the bylaws expressly state that the corporation has no members or define member classes and rights;
- who may call meetings and what notice is required;
- whether remote participation, electronic ballots, proxies, or written/electronic consents are allowed;
- quorum thresholds and whether the draft overrides statutory defaults;
- books and records provisions for voting members; and
- whether the draft's voting provisions match the intended governance model.
Output Pattern
For drafting or revision tasks, prefer:
- the chosen governance model;
- the revised language or proposed article structure;
- short notes on why the language fits the local references; and
- any issues that should be reviewed by counsel or by the organization before adoption.
What Not To Do
- Do not present local sample language as universally correct for every nonprofit.
- Do not assume a generic sample matches Illinois law without checking the Illinois reference first.
- Do not leave hidden conflicts between membership, board authority, and voting provisions.
- Do not copy placeholder text or organization-specific facts from the samples into the final draft.